In the modern era, with its abundant access to technology, digital content and media, information literacy education has never been more important. I was particularly struck by a statement made in The Liturgists Podcast episode 55, Fake News and Media Literacy (2017) in which they said that jurors are told what to consider and what to disregard when they were hearing testimony in court, which ensures that they only consider relevant information when rendering a judgment. In the real world, educators have to take on that role. Otherwise, there would be no system in place for ensuring that learners would be able to separate what is true and relevant and what is not.
Ekdal (2020) said that information is more powerful every year and that “students need solutions to deal with information overload” (p. 41). This cannot be left to chance that individual educators possess the knowledge necessary to support their students. She says that the Big 6, as developed by Mike Eisenberg and Bob Berkowitz helps to focus on the process.
The Big6 Skills Include: Task definition, information seeking strategies, location and access, use of information, synthesis and evaluation.
Information seeking strategies has the greatest intersection of technology, digital resources and information literacy. The Partnership for 21st Century Learning Framework (P21, 2015) shows that in addition to learning the technology skills necessary to find information, learners must also learn to think critically about the information they are able to access with those tools. There are many things to consider when finding sources of information.
The Liturgists podcast (2017) outlined 5 things to consider when determining if a source is reputable:
- Look for named authors and contributors that create accountability.
- Where was it published? (Is this a reputable source? Have I heard of it? Is there an editorial review board? Does it have reviews? Does it publish retractions or corrections or is there a way to write to the editor? Who owns the publication?)
- Date of Publication – Many articles are published from long ago as if they are new.
- Look for specifically named sources.
- Is it well written (grammatical errors, all caps, etc.)?
Additionally they state that even if information is not fake, it is still likely to be biased. Different information providers may place emphasis on the things that are more relevant to their own agendas and undervalue other information that goes against their views. The American Library Association (ALA, 2015) presents a framework that helps in the consideration of the value of factual information.
The authority of the creator should be evaluated based on the context for which the information will be used and that information is generally created for a specific purpose and delivered strategically. The value of the information to the producer is in successful outcome that they intend the information to have. For example, as Liturgists podcast states, many titles have the intention of gaining the consumer’s interest so that they keep reading, and so they can gain ad revenue. Just because the information captures your interest, however, does not mean it is useful or relevant. Research should be an exercise in inquiry. The finding of new information should lead to more questions that keep the conversation ever moving forward in complexity, and drawing on multiple perspectives from collaboration in discussing new insights and discoveries. It is important to factor all of these elements in when evaluating whether the information is reliable for the intended purpose.
As a school librarian, I believe that my own information diet should be varied and extensive. The more information I have to draw on, the more I can help my students. Specifically, it is important to understand the needs and interests of my students and read as much as I can about those subjects, and from as many perspectives as possible. That way, when students ask me questions or make broad statements, I can challenge them to think outside of their narrow views and to consider alternative perspectives as well. Additionally, I should be constantly seeking information that meet my own interests, so that I am modeling the behaviors and skills that I am teaching to my students. Finally, I should be keeping abreast of new ideas and innovations in the LIS field, so that my skills as an educator will remain relevant and useful to my students.
References:
American Library Association. (ALA 2015). Framework for information literacy for higher education. https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework.
Ekdahl, M. (2000). Essential skills for the information age: The Big6 in action. In Teacher librarian (Vancouver) (Vol. 28, Number 2, pp. 41–41). E L Kurdyla Publishing LLC.
Gungor, M. (Executive Producer). (2017). Fake news & media literacy (No. 55) [Audio Podcast Episode]. In The Liturgists Podcast. The Liturgists Inc. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/fake-news-media-literacy/id903433534?i=1000382332635
Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (P21, 2015). Framework for 21st century learning. https://www.marietta.edu/sites/default/files/documents/21st_century_skills_standards_book_2.pdf.